Joe Namath Rehab Center 2013 Playoffs: First Round
#6 Catchin bids not tds (7-6) – Shawn McFarland
@ #3 Mayweather/Peterson 2 (9-4) – Josh Tannenbaum
PROBABLE STARTERS
Pos.
|
McFarland
|
Tannenbaum
|
Advantage
|
QB
|
Matt Stafford (@Phi)
|
Cam Newton
(@NO)
|
McFarland
|
WR1
|
Andre Johnson (@Jax)
|
Larry Fitzgerald (StL)
|
McFarland
|
WR2
|
Roddy White (@GB)
|
TY Hilton (@Cin)
|
PUSH
|
RB1
|
Jamaal Charles (@Wash)
|
LeSean McCoy (Det)
|
PUSH
|
RB2
|
Reggie Bush (@Phi)
|
Shane Vareen (Cle)
|
McFarland
|
TE
|
Julius Thomas (Tenn)
|
Delanie Walker (@Den)
|
McFarland
|
K
|
Nick Novak (NYG)
|
Matt Prater (Tenn)
|
Tannenbaum
|
D
|
Houston (@Jax)
|
Cincinnati (Ind)
|
Tannenbaum
|
WHY MCFARLAND COULD
WIN:
Touchdowns are key in the Joe Namath
Rehab Center
and every single player in McFarland’s starting lineup could score two
touchdowns in any given game. Obviously
Roddy White stands out as the exception to that, but he is looking much more
promising after his ten-catch performance last week.
All six of
McFarland’s skill players have plus match-ups.
Stafford is a top-three QB play this
week, while Johnson, Charles, Bush and Thomas are all arguably top-five at
their respective positions as well. The Rehab Center
rewards .5 points-per-reception, potentially making all four of those guys very
deadly. On top of that, all are top
target/touch monsters in the red zone.
However, if Thomas is inactive once again, McFarland’s advantage at
tight end will quickly be erased. Jacob
Tamme played well two weeks ago, but caught just one ball last week.
Novak and Houston’s defense have
good match-ups as well. San Diego should move the ball at will on the
Giants at home. Fortunately for
McFarland, unlike the case with Matt Prater last week, the Charges aren’t good
enough to score a touchdown every trip down the field. McFarland has no other Chargers on his team
and would like to see San Diego
with 15 points rather than 14 or 21.
Houston has the potential
to do well, but can’t really be trusted after some of its recent performances. Still, the Texans held the Jags to just 13
points two weeks ago. The fact that the
game is being played on a Thursday should help as well.
WHY TANNENBAUM COULD
WIN:
If Newton
were to have a big day in New Orleans and run
for two touchdowns that would quickly offset a great day by Stafford. Newton
certainly has been running less this year as compared to his last two, but you
never know against a defense who likes to blitz and play man coverage across
the board.
Fitzgerald
and McCoy must have good days as well.
Like a few of McFarland’s starters, Tannenbaum has two two-TD guys in
Fitz and Shady. McCoy will likely see a
bunch of targets and could very easily negate any decent day from Charles or
Bush. The Lions have been hard to run
against though, which may mean that McCoy will see a lot of balls out of the
backfield. Vareen had a good day last
week too, but counting on him for a touchdown may be a stretch. Still, Vareen has hauled in 7, 8, 8 and 5
catches in his four games so he should provide a couple of points on receptions
alone.
Hilton was
a push with White because they are both so inconsistent. Hilton hasn’t scored a touchdown since his
three-TD game a month ago. Walker, who
has replaced Jermichael Finley for Tannenbaum, is a stretch as well. Walker
does have five touchdowns on the year, but was concussed last week and his
availability is up in the air.
Prater is
arguably the best kicker in fantasy due to his offense’s ability to get in
field goal range literally every time they have the ball. However, as mentioned before, they also have
the ability to score multiple touchdowns and leave him with measly extra points
(five points last week.)
Cinci’s
defense should be a good play at home against a struggling Colts team. They are currently calling for freezing rain
in Cinci on Sunday. Unfortunately for
Tannenbaum, something will have to give as he has Hilton going against his
defense. The points will offset if
Hilton scores, otherwise Tannenbaum won’t be able to get max points from both
positions.
WHO WINS:
I can’t help but feel as if I am
going to jinx myself hardcore, but based on the match-ups I have to pick
Catchin bids not tds to win. I feel as
if my lineup is capable of producing as well as any left in our playoffs and,
coupled with the plus match-ups across the board, expect my team to advance to
the semi-finals to face Mr. Egan.
#5 DalesBasementVacancy (7-6) – Ross Williams
@ #4 Hangin wit Mr Cooper (8-5) – Louis Peon
PROBABLE STARTERS
Pos.
|
Williams
|
Peon
|
Advantage
|
QB
|
Philip Rivers (NYG)
|
Russell Wilson (@SF)
|
Williams
|
WR1
|
Antonio Brown (Mia)
|
Demaryius Thomas (Ten)
|
Peon
|
WR2
|
Alshon Jeffery (Dal)
|
Harry Douglas (@GB)
|
Williams
|
RB1
|
Alfred Morris (KC)
|
Adrian Peterson (@Balt)
|
Peon
|
RB2
|
Giovani Bernard (Ind)
|
Bobby Rainey (Buf)
|
PUSH
|
TE
|
Martellus Bennett (Dal)
|
Rob Gronkowski (Cle)
|
Peon
|
K
|
Stephen Gostkowski (Cle)
|
Steve Hauschka (@SF)
|
PUSH
|
D
|
San Francisco
(Sea)
|
Kansas City
(@Wash)
|
Peon
|
WHY WILLIAMS COULD
WIN:
Fantasy
football has become a quarterback-driven game and Williams’ signal caller has a
much better match-up than Peon’s. Rivers
could throw for 300-plus yards and a couple of scores and help out a ton. At the same time he could throw one touchdown
with two or three picks. Rivers’
performance will go a long way in determining whether Williams wins or not.
His
receivers have been reception-monsters as of late. Brown is practically a lock for six catches,
while Jeffery has shown what he is capable of the last two weeks. Jeffery gets another favorable match-up this
week against Dallas. The weather may play a factor, but could Jeffery
go for 200 yards three wins in a row? If
he does, and posts a 30-point line like last week, he could cancel out Thomas
and Peterson alone.
Morris and
Bernard aren’t the best running backs to have come playoff time. The Redskins’ offense is dreadful and the
match-up is not very good. At first
glace one might think Bernard has the advantage over Rainey. However, Bernard hasn’t offered much the
weeks he hasn’t scored. Bad weeks from
these two could doom Williams.
Bennett
could catch a touchdown, or he could catch two balls for 14 yards like last
week. Which will it be? Oh, the luck of fantasy.
Gostkowski
is as good as they come, but do you ever really know what to expect from a
kicker? San Fran’s D is always
tough. They are at home, but Williams
can’t be too thrilled after watching the Seahawks dismantle the Saints last
week.
WHY PEON COULD WIN:
Peon has three guys, Thomas,
Peterson and Gronkowski, who probably have at least a 70 percent chance of
scoring a touchdown. Those are very,
very good odds. Williams’ best would be
Brown or Jeffery, and I would put their chances around 50-50.
If those
three guys get in the end zone, and Jeffery doesn’t go wild for Williams, I
think Peon will be looking good. Douglas
and Rainer are wild cards and anything more than six points should be viewed as
gravy. The Falcons should be throwing a
ton at Green Bay, while Buffalo is allowing over a hundred yards on
the ground.
Where the
game will be won or lost will be in the quarterback vs. defense match-up. If Wilson
does well and limits his turnovers, that means Williams didn’t get a
game-changing performance out of his defense.
If Wilson throws a few picks and only
musters 14-21 points, maybe he throws a touchdown (or a pick-six), then
Williams’ defense will probably have outscored Wilson.
That alone could offset a lot of points.
Peon will
like his defensive match-up, however the Chiefs have given up a ton of points
as of late. Plus they will be on the
road. RGIII is turnover prone, but
scoring 14 points to negate any scoring other than sacks and turnovers is
definitely do-able.
WHO WINS:
I am going to go with Peon. Williams has a few guys that can go off in
Rivers and Jeffery, but Peon has more in Thomas, AP and Gronk. Wilson
at San Fran might have been scary a few weeks ago, but not now. He seems to have the game completely under
control. I think Peon winning the QB vs.
D match-up, along with getting at least two touchdowns from his big three, will
lead him to victory.
No comments:
Post a Comment